Re: [PATCH 0/4] vfs: update ->get_link() related documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 1 May 2019 02:36:49 +0100
Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thought I'd replied; apparently not...  Anyway, the problem with those
> is that there'd been a series of patches converting vfs.txt to new
> format; I'm not sure what Jon is going to do with it, but these are
> certain to conflict.  I've no objections to the contents of changes,
> but if that stuff is getting massive reformatting the first two
> probably ought to go through Jon's tree.  I can take the last two
> at any point.
> 
> Jon, what's the status of the format conversion?

Last I saw, it seemed that you wanted changes in how things were done and
that Tobin (added to CC) had stepped back.  Tobin, are your thoughts on
the matter different?  I could try to shoehorn them in for 5.2 still, I
guess, but perhaps the best thing to do is to just take Eric's patch, and
the reformatting can work around it if need be.

Thanks,

jon



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux