Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:31:44 -0700
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Omar Kilani <omar.kilani@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190427093319.sgicqik2oqkez3wk@dcvr>

I tried to replicate the failure on qemu.
I do not see the failure with N=32.

Does it work for N < 32?
Does any other signal work?
Are there any other architectures that fail?

Could you help me figure out how to run just the one test that is failing?

-Deepa

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
  - From: Eric Wong

References:
- Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
  - From: Eric Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Lazy file reflink
Next by Date: Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
Previous by thread: Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
Next by thread: Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux