Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Add polling support to pidfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20.04.19 01:02, Christian Brauner wrote:

> I'm sorry, who has agreed that a non-parent should be able to wait for
> process death?
> I know you proposed that but has anyone ever substantially supported this?

I actually support this.

One practical usecase I have in mind for some upcoming projects is
monitoring processes in a container from the outside.


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux