Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] arm: Use STACK_TOP when computing mmap base address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/18/19 1:27 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
mmap base address must be computed wrt stack top address, using TASK_SIZE
is wrong since STACK_TOP and TASK_SIZE are not equivalent.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/mm/mmap.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
index bff3d00bda5b..0b94b674aa91 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@

  /* gap between mmap and stack */
  #define MIN_GAP                (128*1024*1024UL)
-#define MAX_GAP                ((TASK_SIZE)/6*5)
+#define MAX_GAP                ((STACK_TOP)/6*5)
Parens around STACK_TOP aren't needed, but you'll be removing it
entirely, so I can't complain. ;)

  #define STACK_RND_MASK (0x7ff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12))

  static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
         else if (gap > MAX_GAP)
                 gap = MAX_GAP;

-       return PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE - gap - rnd);
+       return PAGE_ALIGN(STACK_TOP - gap - rnd);
  }

  /*
--
2.20.1

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks !





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux