Re: [PATCH v3 11/26] ceph: fix compat_ioctl for ceph_dir_operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:23 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:19:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The ceph_ioctl function is used both for files and directories, but only
> > the files support doing that in 32-bit compat mode.
> >
> > For consistency, add the same compat handler to the dir operations
> > as well.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/ceph/dir.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> > index a8f429882249..7c060cb22aa3 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> > @@ -1785,6 +1785,7 @@ const struct file_operations ceph_dir_fops = {
> >       .open = ceph_open,
> >       .release = ceph_release,
> >       .unlocked_ioctl = ceph_ioctl,
> > +     .compat_ioctl = ceph_ioctl,
>
> Again, broken on s390 (and so's the ceph_file_ops, of course).
> It wants compat_ptr() applied to argument...

This gets changed in a later patch, I intentionally left this one
doing the same as ceph_file_fops so the patch can be
backported if necessary, without also backporting the
patch that adds compat_ptr_ioctl.

       Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux