Re: [PATCH 2/4] leases: when unlocking, skip locking-related steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi David-
>
> On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:29 PM, David M. Richter wrote:
>> In generic_setlease(), we don't need to allocate a new struct  
>> file_lock
>> or check for readers or writers when called with F_UNLCK.
>
> Since you re-ordered the locks_alloc_lock call in the next patch, it  
> seems to me this would look a lot cleaner with a switch statement  
> instead of all these "if (arg == F_FOO)".

This could certainly be cleaner, but I took a quick look and didn't see
how to do what you were suggesting--probably just me being dense.

David's changes seem reasonable enough on their own, so I'd take any
cleanup as an incremental patch on top.

--b.

>
>> Signed-off-by: David M. Richter <richterd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/locks.c |   24 +++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
>> index b9f3a0b..da1d0dd 100644
>> --- a/fs/locks.c
>> +++ b/fs/locks.c
>> @@ -1367,18 +1367,20 @@ int generic_setlease(struct file *filp, long  
>> arg, struct file_lock **flp)
>>
>> 	lease = *flp;
>>
>> -	error = -EAGAIN;
>> -	if ((arg == F_RDLCK) && (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0))
>> -		goto out;
>> -	if ((arg == F_WRLCK)
>> -	    && ((atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1)
>> -		|| (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > 1)))
>> -		goto out;
>> +	if (arg != F_UNLCK) {
>> +		error = -EAGAIN;
>> +		if ((arg == F_RDLCK) && (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0))
>> +			goto out;
>> +		if ((arg == F_WRLCK)
>> +		    && ((atomic_read(&dentry->d_count) > 1)
>> +			|| (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) > 1)))
>> +			goto out;
>>
>> -	error = -ENOMEM;
>> -	new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
>> -	if (new_fl == NULL)
>> -		goto out;
>> +		error = -ENOMEM;
>> +		new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
>> +		if (new_fl == NULL)
>> +			goto out;
>> +	}
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * At this point, we know that if there is an exclusive
>> -- 
>> 1.5.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- 
>> fsdevel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux