Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:33:33 +0200
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190408061604.GA26364@lst.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 08:16:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Actually..  I just noticed the gratious done rename creates a (trivial)
conflict in a series I was about to submit for 5.2.  Can you respin
it without the rename to make everyones life a littler easier?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
  - From: Ming Lei

References:
- [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
  - From: Ming Lei
- Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fscrypt: d_revalidate fixes and cleanups
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V2] block: don't use for-inside-for in bio_for_each_segment_all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]