On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:24:26PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:02 PM Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, maybe but it still feels cleaner and more obvious to just add: > > > > static long long_zero; > > > > given that most callers actually seem to want an (unsigned) int. > > > > I don't have a strong opinion though so if others feel that it's just a > > waste of space consider it acked. > > > > Well, given that the value is zero, in this expectional case we could > avoid duplicating the symbol and save 4 bytes. > What the maintainers think? If we care about saving four bytes, we could just pass the address of ZERO_PAGE(0).
