Re: Is it possible that certain physical disk doesn't implement flush correctly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/03/19 13:31, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if it's possible that certain physical device doesn't
> handle flush correctly.
>
> E.g. some vendor does some complex logical in their hdd controller to
> skip certain flush request (but not all, obviously) to improve performance?
>
> Do anyone see such reports?
>
> And if proves to happened before, how do we users detect such problem?
>
> Can we just check the flush time against the write before flush call?
> E.g. write X random blocks into that device, call fsync() on it, check
> the execution time. Repeat Y times, and compare the avg/std.
> And change X to 2X/4X/..., repeat above check.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>

Afaik HDDs and SSDs do lie to fsync()

unless the write cache is turned off with hdparm,

hdparm -W0 /dev/sda

similarly to RAID controllers.

see below

https://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html

https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2367378


-





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux