From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Introduces put_user_page(), which simply calls put_page().
This provides a way to update all get_user_pages*() callers,
so that they call put_user_page(), instead of put_page().
Also introduces put_user_pages(), and a few dirty/locked variations,
as a replacement for release_pages(), and also as a replacement
for open-coded loops that release multiple pages.
These may be used for subsequent performance improvements,
via batching of pages to be released.
This is the first step of fixing a problem (also described in [1] and
[2]) with interactions between get_user_pages ("gup") and filesystems.
Problem description: let's start with a bug report. Below, is what happens
sometimes, under memory pressure, when a driver pins some pages via gup,
and then marks those pages dirty, and releases them. Note that the gup
documentation actually recommends that pattern. The problem is that the
filesystem may do a writeback while the pages were gup-pinned, and then the
filesystem believes that the pages are clean. So, when the driver later
marks the pages as dirty, that conflicts with the filesystem's page
tracking and results in a BUG(), like this one that I experienced:
kernel BUG at /build/linux-fQ94TU/linux-4.4.0/fs/ext4/inode.c:1899!
backtrace:
ext4_writepage
__writepage
write_cache_pages
ext4_writepages
do_writepages
__writeback_single_inode
writeback_sb_inodes
__writeback_inodes_wb
wb_writeback
wb_workfn
process_one_work
worker_thread
kthread
ret_from_fork
...which is due to the file system asserting that there are still buffer
heads attached:
({ \
BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); \
((struct buffer_head *)page_private(page)); \
})
Dave Chinner's description of this is very clear:
"The fundamental issue is that ->page_mkwrite must be called on every
write access to a clean file backed page, not just the first one.
How long the GUP reference lasts is irrelevant, if the page is clean
and you need to dirty it, you must call ->page_mkwrite before it is
marked writeable and dirtied. Every. Time."
This is just one symptom of the larger design problem: real filesystems
that actually write to a backing device, do not actually support
get_user_pages() being called on their pages, and letting hardware write
directly to those pages--even though that pattern has been going on since
about 2005 or so.
The steps are to fix it are:
1) (This patch): provide put_user_page*() routines, intended to be used
for releasing pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*().
2) Convert all of the call sites for get_user_pages*(), to
invoke put_user_page*(), instead of put_page(). This involves dozens of
call sites, and will take some time.
3) After (2) is complete, use get_user_pages*() and put_user_page*() to
implement tracking of these pages. This tracking will be separate from
the existing struct page refcounting.
4) Use the tracking and identification of these pages, to implement
special handling (especially in writeback paths) when the pages are
backed by a filesystem.
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/774411/ : "DMA and get_user_pages()"
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/ : "The Trouble with get_user_pages()"
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # docs
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 24 +++++++++++
mm/gup.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 76769749b5a5..a216c738d2f2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -994,6 +994,30 @@ static inline void put_page(struct page *page)
__put_page(page);
}
+/**
+ * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page
+ * @page: pointer to page to be released
+ *
+ * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via
+ * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines
+ * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via
+ * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In
+ * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special
+ * handling.
+ *
+ * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early
+ * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must
+ * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls.
+ */
+static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ put_page(page);
+}
+
+void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+
#if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
#define SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
#endif
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index f84e22685aaa..d3e4510fe3f8 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -28,6 +28,111 @@ struct follow_page_context {
unsigned int page_mask;
};
+typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page);
+
+static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
+ unsigned long npages,
+ set_dirty_func_t sdf)
+{
+ unsigned long index;
+
+ for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
+ struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+
+ /*
+ * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
+ * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases:
+ *
+ * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips
+ * the call to sdf(). That could happen because
+ * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(),
+ * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is
+ * going to get written back, which meets the original
+ * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well:
+ * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call
+ * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back.
+ *
+ * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf().
+ * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it
+ * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle.
+ * This is harmless.
+ */
+ if (!PageDirty(page))
+ sdf(page);
+
+ put_user_page(page);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
+ * variants called on that page.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
+ * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
+ * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ *
+ */
+void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+{
+ __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty);
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
+ * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
+ * the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ *
+ * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
+ *
+ */
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+{
+ __put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
+
+/**
+ * put_user_pages() - release an array of gup-pinned pages.
+ * @pages: array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ *
+ * For each page in the @pages array, release the page using put_user_page().
+ *
+ * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
+ */
+void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+{
+ unsigned long index;
+
+ /*
+ * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
+ * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
+ * single operation to the head page should suffice.
+ */
+ for (index = 0; index < npages; index++)
+ put_user_page(pages[index]);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages);
+
static struct page *no_page_table(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned int flags)
{
--
2.21.0
