Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > looks like a mostly mechanical change. Do you want this to go through > the USB tree or FS tree? I'm going to try and get all of these to go through the Al's vfs tree since there are dependent cleanup patches that remove code that's then obsolete. > Also, do you mind doing the same for drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c? Sure. The reason I hadn't already done it is that it doesn't look entirely trivial. David
