Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/19/19 11:12 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, john.hubbard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> We seem to have pretty solid consensus on the concept and details of the
>> put_user_pages() approach. Or at least, if we don't, someone please speak
>> up now. Christopher Lameter, especially, since you had some concerns
>> recently.
> 
> My concerns do not affect this patchset which just marks the get/put for
> the pagecache. The problem was that the description was making claims that
> were a bit misleading and seemed to prescribe a solution.
> 
> So lets get this merged. Whatever the solution will be, we will need this
> markup.
> 

Sounds good. Do you care to promote that thought into a formal ACK for me? :)


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux