Re: [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: allow to forbid unprivileged users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 09:01:47AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:36:58PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > (The idea comes from Andrea, and following discussions with Mike and
> >  other people)
> > 
> > This patchset introduces a new sysctl flag to allow the admin to
> > forbid users from using userfaultfd:
> > 
> >   $ cat /proc/sys/vm/unprivileged_userfaultfd
> >   [disabled] enabled kvm
> > 
> >   - When set to "disabled", all unprivileged users are forbidden to
> >     use userfaultfd syscalls.
> > 
> >   - When set to "enabled", all users are allowed to use userfaultfd
> >     syscalls.
> > 
> >   - When set to "kvm", all unprivileged users are forbidden to use the
> >     userfaultfd syscalls, except the user who has permission to open
> >     /dev/kvm.
> > 
> > This new flag can add one more layer of security to reduce the attack
> > surface of the kernel by abusing userfaultfd.  Here we grant the
> > thread userfaultfd permission by checking against CAP_SYS_PTRACE
> > capability.  By default, the value is "disabled" which is the most
> > strict policy.  Distributions can have their own perferred value.
> > 
> > The "kvm" entry is a bit special here only to make sure that existing
> > users like QEMU/KVM won't break by this newly introduced flag.  What
> > we need to do is simply set the "unprivileged_userfaultfd" flag to
> > "kvm" here to automatically grant userfaultfd permission for processes
> > like QEMU/KVM without extra code to tweak these flags in the admin
> > code.
> > 
> > Patch 1:  The interface patch to introduce the flag
> > 
> > Patch 2:  The KVM related changes to detect opening of /dev/kvm
> > 
> > Patch 3:  Apply the flag to userfaultfd syscalls
>  
> I'd appreciate to see "Patch 4: documentation update" ;-)
> It'd be also great to update the man pages after this is merged.

Oops, sorry!  I should have remembered that.

> 
> Except for the comment to patch 1, feel free to add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Mike!  I'll take it for 2/3 until I got confirmation from you
on patch 1.

Regards,

-- 
Peter Xu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux