Re: [RESEND, PATCH v2] fuse: Don't drop NOTIFY_REPLY if we promised it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:47:57PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 09:10:15AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > I more or less agree with this statement. However can we please make the
> > > breakage to be explicitly visible with an error instead of exhibiting it
> > > via harder to debug stucks/deadlocks? For example sys_read < max_write
> > > -> error instead of getting stuck. And if notify_retrieve requests
> > > buffer larger than max_write -> error or cut to max_write, but don't
> > > return OK when we know we will never send what was requested to
> > > filesystem even if it uses max_write sized reads. What is the point of
> > > breaking in hard to diagnose way when we can make the breakage showing
> > > itself explicitly? Would a patch for such behaviour accepted?
> > 
> > Sure, if it's only adds a couple of lines.   Adding more than say ten
> > lines for such a non-bug fix is definitely excessive.
> 
> Ok, thanks. Please consider applying the following patch. (It's a bit
> pity to hear the problem is not considered to be a bug, but anyway).
> 
> I will also send the second patch as another mail, since I could not
> made `git am --scissors` to apply several patched extracted from one
> mail successfully.

Ping. Miklos, is there anything wrong with this patch and its
second counterpart?

Thank beforehand for feedback,
Kirill


> ---- 8< ----
> From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:06:18 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fuse: retrieve: cap requested size to negotiated
>  max_write
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> FUSE filesystem server and kernel client negotiate during initialization
> phase, what should be the maximum write size the client will ever issue.
> Correspondingly the filesystem server then queues sys_read calls to read
> requests with buffer capacity large enough to carry request header
> + that max_write bytes. A filesystem server is free to set its max_write
> in anywhere in the range between [1·page, fc->max_pages·page]. In
> particular go-fuse[2] sets max_write by default as 64K, wheres default
> fc->max_pages corresponds to 128K. Libfuse also allows users to
> configure max_write, but by default presets it to possible maximum.
> 
> If max_write is < fc->max_pages·page, and in NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler we
> allow to retrieve more than max_write bytes, corresponding prepared
> NOTIFY_REPLY will be thrown away by fuse_dev_do_read, because the
> filesystem server, in full correspondence with server/client contract,
> will be only queuing sys_read with ~max_write buffer capacity, and
> fuse_dev_do_read throws away requests that cannot fit into server
> request buffer. In turn the filesystem server could get stuck waiting
> indefinitely for NOTIFY_REPLY since NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler returned OK
> which is understood by clients as that NOTIFY_REPLY was queued and will
> be sent back.
> 
> -> Cap requested size to negotiate max_write to avoid the problem.
> This aligns with the way NOTIFY_RETRIEVE handler works, which already
> unconditionally caps requested retrieve size to fuse_conn->max_pages.
> This way it should not hurt NOTIFY_RETRIEVE semantic if we return less
> data than was originally requested.
> 
> Please see [1] for context where the problem of stuck filesystem was hit
> for real, how the situation was traced and for more involving patch that
> did not make it into the tree.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=155057023600853&w=2
> [2] https://github.com/hanwen/go-fuse
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v2.6.36+
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index 8a63e52785e9..38e94bc43053 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ static int fuse_retrieve(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct inode *inode,
>  	offset = outarg->offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
>  	file_size = i_size_read(inode);
>  
> -	num = outarg->size;
> +	num = min(outarg->size, fc->max_write);
>  	if (outarg->offset > file_size)
>  		num = 0;
>  	else if (outarg->offset + num > file_size)
> -- 
> 2.21.0.352.gf09ad66450





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux