On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 09:09 -0500, Qian Cai wrote: > On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 16:07 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:03 PM Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Of course, that's just gcc. I have no idea what llvm ends up doing. > > > > > > Clang 7.0: > > > > > > # clang -O2 -S -Wall /tmp/test.c > > > /tmp/test.c:46:6: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever > > > 'if' > > > condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] > > > > Ok, good. > > > > Do we have any clang builds in any of the zero-day robot > > infrastructure or something? Should we? > > > > And maybe this was how Dan noticed the problem in the first place? Or > > is it just because of his eagle-eyes? > > > > BTW, even clang is able to generate warnings in your sample code, it does not > generate any warnings when compiling the buggy shmem.o via "make CC=clang". > Here is the objdump for arm64 (with KASAN_SW_TAGS inline). > Ah, thanks to the commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning globally"), it will no longer generate this type of warnings until using "make W=1" due to the commit a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for 'make W=1'"). Anyway, the generated code is the same using clang with and without this patch. d_instantiate(dentry, inode); 4eec: 94000000 bl 0 <d_instantiate> ret = shmem_reserve_inode(inode->i_sb); 4ef0: 2a1f03e0 mov w0, wzr <---- ret = 0 return ret;