Re: [fuse-devel] [fuse] Relevance of st_ino values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:18 PM Jean-Pierre André
<jean-pierre.andre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > For several requests, FUSE userspace returns a struct stat to the
> > kernel. struct stat includes an st_ino field, but FUSE generally has a
> > separate field for the inode (e.g. fuse_entry_param.ino vs
> > fuse_entry_param.attr.st_ino).
> >
> > Does the kernel use the st_ino value at all, or is just passed through
> > to userspace?

st_ino value is not used in any way by the kernel, just passed through
to userspace.

>
> Fuse defines its own inode number in order to track the path used
> to access a file. So, when a file is recorded in several directories,
> it is referenced by fuse with several inode numbers.

The high level lib does this, yes.

When using the lowlevel lib, it's up to the filesystem implementation:
passthrough_ll uses the struct lo_inode pointer (which is specific to
a certain real file) as nodeid, so no multi-caching (and related
problems with consistency) in case of hard links.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux