On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 2:23 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> OK, I guess my question was not precise. What does prevent taking fs
> locks down the path?
IOCB_NOWAIT has never meant that, and will never mean it.
We will never give user space those kinds of guarantees. We do locking
for various reasons. For example, we'll do the mm lock just when
fetching/storing data from/to user space if there's a page fault. Or -
more obviously - we'll also check for - and sleep on - mandatory locks
in rw_verify_area().
There is nothing like "atomic IO" to user space. We simply do not give
those kinds of guarantees. That's even more true when this is a
information leak that we shouldn't expose to user space in the first
place.
Linus
