On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:25:12AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Especially with poll support now in the series, don't we need a ѕigmask > > argument similar to pselect/ppoll/io_pgetevents now to deal with signal > > blocking during waiting for events? > > Is there any way to avoid passing in the sigset_t size? If it's just a > 32-bit/64-bit thing, surely the in_compat_syscall() could cover it? Or > are there other cases that need to be catered to? As far as I can tell we never look at it, never looked at it and don't have any plans to look at it anytime soon. But when I tried to omit it for io_pgetevents I got stong pushback and thus had to add the crazy double indirection calling convention.
