Re: file offset corruption on 32-bit machines?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

> [*] file_pos_{read,write} (fs/read_write.c) are not called under lock (in 
> sys_read, sys_write, ...), so even if f_pos is written atomically, you will 
> be able to get races when accessing shared descriptor from different threads.

There are however cases when such behavior is perfectly valid: For example
you can have a file of records of a fixed size, whose order does not matter.
Then multiple processes can produce the records in parallel, sharing
a single fd.

> I think that POSIX states, that behavior is undefined under these conditions.

Do you have a pointer to that?

				Have a nice fortnight
-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares                          <mj@xxxxxx>   http://mj.ucw.cz/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
Mr. Worf, scan that ship."  "Aye, Captain... 600 DPI?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux