On 15.01.2019 18:39, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:46 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like we can optimize old_req page replacement
>> and avoid copying by simple updating the request's page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> index c6650c68b31a..83b54b082c86 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> @@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_in_flight(struct fuse_req *new_req,
>> if (old_req->num_pages == 1 && old_req != first_req) {
>> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(page->mapping->host);
>>
>> - copy_highpage(old_req->pages[0], page);
>> + swap(old_req->pages[0], page);
>
> This would mess up refcounting for all pages involved. need to swap
> with the temp page in new_req. Fixed version in #for-next.
You are sure, page is just a simple pointer, not struct **page.
Then we would have had to change fuse_writepage_in_flight() to use ** pointer.
Updated version looks good for me.
Thanks,
Kirill
