On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jörn Engel wrote: > "Logfs file system" might make sense. LOGFS_FS is something I would > rather avoid. For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repetition, > redundancy and superfluous information. > How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
