Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
> "Logfs file system" might make sense.  LOGFS_FS is something I would
> rather avoid.  For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repetition,
> redundancy and superfluous information.
> 

How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument
either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux