Hi, Miklos,
any comments about this?
On 26.11.2018 12:46, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Checking for FR_PENDING in fuse_writepage_in_flight() is racy.
> It does not guarantee the first request in misc.write.next list
> is not in userspace, since there we take fc->lock, while
> fuse_dev_do_read() takes fiq->waitq.lock:
>
> fuse_dev_read() fuse_writepage_in_flight()
> test_bit(FR_PENDING)
> clear_bit(FR_PENDING)
> handle old_req->pages[0] in userspace
> copy_highpage(old_req->pages[0], page)
> ^^^^^
> userspace never sees this pages
>
> The only reliable way to determ, whether we are able to replace
> old_req's page, is to completely skip the first request in the list.
> This patch makes the function to do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index b52f9baaa3e7..c6650c68b31a 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -1740,6 +1740,7 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_in_flight(struct fuse_req *new_req,
> {
> struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(new_req->inode);
> struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(new_req->inode);
> + struct fuse_req *first_req;
> struct fuse_req *tmp;
> struct fuse_req *old_req;
> bool found = false;
> @@ -1764,6 +1765,7 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_in_flight(struct fuse_req *new_req,
> }
>
> new_req->num_pages = 1;
> + first_req = old_req;
> for (tmp = old_req; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->misc.write.next) {
> BUG_ON(tmp->inode != new_req->inode);
> curr_index = tmp->misc.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -1773,7 +1775,7 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_in_flight(struct fuse_req *new_req,
> }
> }
>
> - if (old_req->num_pages == 1 && test_bit(FR_PENDING, &old_req->flags)) {
> + if (old_req->num_pages == 1 && old_req != first_req) {
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(page->mapping->host);
>
> copy_highpage(old_req->pages[0], page);
>
