Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] fuse: Further reducing contention of fc->lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:20 PM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On 09.11.2018 13:33, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > v2: Removed patch [1/6] from v1, and [4/6] from v1 is replaced
> >     with new patch (which is [2/5] in this v2).
> >
> > There was introduced fc->bg_lock to reduce the contention,
> > and this patchset continues this efforts.
> >
> > This patchset introduces per fuse_inode lock to protect
> > inode metadata, synchronization with background writes, etc.
> > All of the above is related to a single inode, and there
> > is no a reason, that inodes are concurrents of each other
> > to make some of actions exclusive.
> >
> > So, here we introduce fuse_inode::lock spinlock and get rid
> > of fc->lock in many places.

Pushed to fuse.git#for-next.

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux