Re: [PATCHSET v1] io_uring IO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 Jan 2019, at 11:00, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:56:29AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> After some arm twisting from Christoph, I finally caved and divorced 
>> the
>> aio-poll patches from aio/libaio itself. The io_uring interface 
>> itself
>> is useful and efficient, and after rebasing all the new goodies on 
>> top
>> of that, there was little reason to retail the aio connection.
>>
>> Hence io_uring was born. This is what I previously called scqring for
>> aio, but now as a standalone entity. Patch #5 adds the core of this
>> interface, but in short, it has two main data structures:
>
> Please can we call it something that looks a little less like 
> io_urine?
> aio_ring?  io_ring?  ring_io?

We must be using the same fonts, I've been harassing Jens with jokes 
about this for days.  But, I totally missed the link between io_uring 
and https://twitter.com/axboe/status/927571366085246976 until just now.  
It's clear that Jens has been planning this for over a year, and he was 
just waiting for us to catch on.


Really though, io_uring is growing on me.  The kernel is full of rings 
and it does help set it apart.

-chris




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux