On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Mateusz Stępień wrote: > Thank you for the quick response, unfortunately the patch does not work, > problem still persist. OK, I reproduced the bug. > I saw the other mail thread, and it looks like the proper solution > described by Al will take some time. I don't know if we can afford right > now to write a proper patch ourselves, also at least my understanding is > that this is a regression, so my question is: can we expect a proper > patch in a coming weeks? If not, will reverting the patch at fault have > any more negative side effects? Of course it will bring back the > behaviour it was supposed to fix, but are there any other issues? Other issues, no.
