Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: 程洋 <d17103513@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:10:51 +0300
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CADd0cq21TfsncsoViQD+1Q=GKyjG5fKuWEnZr8JxevLh3mSeag@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:21:40PM +0800, 程洋 wrote:
> Actually I'm pretty sure kernel calls proc_mount()
> Here is the call stack

OK, hidepid= is still misdesigned. :-(

References:
- > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
  - From: 程洋
- Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
  - From: 程洋
- Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan
- Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
  - From: 程洋

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] fs-verity: add a documentation file
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Revert "fs/iomap.c: get/put the page in iomap_page_create/release()"
Previous by thread: Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly
Next by thread: [PATCH] proc/sysctl: fix return error for proc_doulongvec_minmax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux