Re: [PATCH 3/3] iomap: optimize iomap_is_partially_uptodate for full page range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 04:25:29PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> We only call ->is_partially_uptodate to look for an uptodate range
> within a not-uptodate page.
> 
> If the range covers all blocks in the page, there is no point to checking
> each block individually - if the whole range (i.e. the whole page) were
> uptodate, the page would be uptodate as well.  Hence in this case, we
> can return early and skip the loop.
> 
> This is similar to what is done in block_is_partially_uptodate().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/iomap.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
> index ce837d9..7d7d985 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,10 @@ struct iomap_readpage_ctx {
>  	first = from >> inode->i_blkbits;
>  	last = (from + len - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits;
>  
> +	/* If page wasn't uptodate and range covers all blocks: no partial */
> +	if (first == 0 && last == (PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits)
> +		return 0;
> +

Even if the range covers the entire page, we still have to check
that all the individual blocks in the page are up to date or not.
Hence I think this is wrong....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux