On Tue 11-12-18 10:27:23, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > Use the aptly named function rather than opencoding i_writecount check. > No functional changes. > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! Added to my tree. Honza > --- > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > index e03be5071362..98b0769e4cf2 100644 > --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c > @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static int fanotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_group *group, > */ > if ((flags & FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK) && > !(flags & FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY) && > - (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0)) > + inode_is_open_for_write(inode)) > return 0; > > return fanotify_add_mark(group, &inode->i_fsnotify_marks, > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR