On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:22 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's a patch series that's been baking for a while that will likely > go upstream either in the next upcoming merge window, or the one after > that. Since it adds support for Unicode case-folding, it involves a > non-trivial number of changes to fs/nls. As near as I can tell, no > one is really maintaining fs/nls. Christ. Why do people want to do this? We know it's a crazy and stupid thing to do. And we know that, exactly because people have done it, and it has always been a mistake. It causes actual and very subtle security issues. It breaks things subtly even when they supposedly "know" about case folding because different things will do it differently (ie user space vs kernel space not having the *exact* same rules due to using different tables, for example). It doesn't work with locales, because people often want different locales at the same time. And it slows things down enormously because you can't do hashing well, and comparisons get hugely more expensive. And to add insult to injury, people always implement it so *horribly* badly that it's not even funny. For example, the usual way that people do it is to case-fold two strings, and then compare the end results. And that's *incredibly* stupid and slow and generates extra temporary allocations etc. Or people to it character-by-character instead, and don't understand utf-8 (which is literally designed to be easy to see character boundaries *without* having to do a full decode!), and do *that* incredibly badly instead. And when you create a file with an ambiguous name, what does readdir report? Does it report the name you used, some normalized thing, or what? Finally, people then invariably do it in ways that preclude any concurrent sane uses. For example, they make it a single mount-time flag for the whole filesystem, so now if you are (for example) wanting to do emulation of bad system decisions, you now force the *host* to buy into the whole mistake too. And they make it a whole-filesystem flag, instead of (for example) allowing just the emulated environment to do case-insensitive filesystem operations on an operation-by-operation basis, and possibly only within a particular subdirectory structure (or bind mount). So the first thing I want to know is who really needs it, *why* they need it, and what the design is for. Because I can almost guarantee that the design is horrible, and the reasons are really really bad. And what *are* the case insensitivity rules, and how do you co-exist when there are two *different* folding rules at the same time? For example, OS X has some truly horrendously bad rules, that take the badness that Windows did to a whole different level. What if you're a file server (or emulation environment) and you want to expose the same filesystem to both of those environments? Because it would quite possibly be a whole lot better to allow per-operation flags, so that you can do fd = openat(dir, path, O_RDONLY | O_ICASE); so that you can allow *one* process to treat a filesystem as if it was case insensitive (think "Wine in with a ~/.wine/C directory"), without forcing the whole filesystem to be icase. Yes, allowing concurrent use then generates whole new "interesting" questions, like "what happens if a case _sensitive_ user creates two files with names that are identical to a in-sensitive user", but they aren't necessarily any worse than the issues you face *not* allowing that. > Given your recent comments about not wanting to see pull requests for > things outside of fs/xfs as part of the xfs pull, do you have any > opinions about how to do manage this feature going upstream? My > original plan was to send them through the ext4 tree, since I very > much doubt Al cares much about nls issues, and they will only impact > ext4. I really want to know what is driving this insanity, and what the actual use-case is. You have a diffstat, but not a git tree to look at what the heck is going on. Seriously, case insensitivity is *such* a horrendously bad idea that people need to think about it deeply, and nobody seems to ever do that. And yes, we have d_hash() and some rudimentary support for it in the VFS layer, but that VFS layer bit was always meant purely for interoperability filesystems that nobody really cared about as a real filesystem for Linux. Notably FAT and its ilk. If we have a major native filesystem doing it, I think we need to actively think about the big picture and do it *right*. None of the crazy "ok, you can't even look things up in the dcache directly at all" stuff that we have as a hack to just allow _bad_ filesystems to do their thing. So I think this is a bigger deal than that diffstat of yours implies. I don't think people understand just how *bad* case insensitivity is. The old DOS/Mac people thought case insensitivity was a "helpful" idea, and that was understandable - but wrong - even back in the 80's. They are still living with the end result of that horrendously bad decision decades later. They've _tried_ to fix their bad decisions, and have never been able to (except, apparently, in iOS where somebody finally had a glimmer of a clue). Linus