Re: [PATCH 00/16] v6 kernel core pieces refcount conversions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:07 AM Elena Reshetova
<elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Changes in v6:
>  * memory ordering differences are outlined in each patch
>    together with potential problematic areas.
>   Note: I didn't include any statements in individual patches
>   on why I think the memory ordering changes do not matter
>   in that particular case since ultimately these are only
>   known by maintainers (unless explicitly documented) and
>   very hard to figure out reliably from the code.
>   Therefore maintainers are expected to double check the
>   specific pointed functions and make the end decision.
>  * rebase on top of today's linux-next/master

*thread resurrection*

Was there a v7 for this series? I'd like to finish off any of the
known outstanding refcount_t conversions.

Thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux