Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event triggering invalidation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon,  3 Dec 2018 15:18:17 -0500 jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> CPU page table update can happens for many reasons, not only as a result
> of a syscall (munmap(), mprotect(), mremap(), madvise(), ...) but also
> as a result of kernel activities (memory compression, reclaim, migration,
> ...).
> 
> Users of mmu notifier API track changes to the CPU page table and take
> specific action for them. While current API only provide range of virtual
> address affected by the change, not why the changes is happening.
> 
> This patchset adds event information so that users of mmu notifier can
> differentiate among broad category:
>     - UNMAP: munmap() or mremap()
>     - CLEAR: page table is cleared (migration, compaction, reclaim, ...)
>     - PROTECTION_VMA: change in access protections for the range
>     - PROTECTION_PAGE: change in access protections for page in the range
>     - SOFT_DIRTY: soft dirtyness tracking
> 
> Being able to identify munmap() and mremap() from other reasons why the
> page table is cleared is important to allow user of mmu notifier to
> update their own internal tracking structure accordingly (on munmap or
> mremap it is not longer needed to track range of virtual address as it
> becomes invalid).
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  			struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>  			struct mmu_gather tlb;
>  
> +			range.event = MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR;
>  			range.start = vma->vm_start;
>  			range.end = vma->vm_end;
>  			range.mm = mm;

mmu_notifier_range and MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR aren't defined if
CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER=n.

I'll try a temporary bodge:

+++ a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
 struct mmu_notifier;
 struct mmu_notifier_ops;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
-
 /*
  * The mmu notifier_mm structure is allocated and installed in
  * mm->mmu_notifier_mm inside the mm_take_all_locks() protected
@@ -32,6 +30,8 @@ struct mmu_notifier_range {
 	bool blockable;
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
+
 struct mmu_notifier_ops {
 	/*
 	 * Called either by mmu_notifier_unregister or when the mm is


But this new code should vanish altogether if CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER=n,
please.  Or at least, we shouldn't be unnecessarily initializing .mm
and .event.  Please take a look at debloating this code.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux