On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:48:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > >> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't > >> necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored > >> medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain > >> contexts on most channels in the UK and EU. > > > > This makes following the CoC extremely hard to a non-native speaker as > > it is not too explicit on what is OK and what is not. I did through the > > whole thing with an eye glass and this what I deduced from it. > > It would be helpful if you could explain what part of the language > is unclear wrt. explaining how CoC does not apply to existing code. > > That part seems very explicit to me. Well, now that I re-read it, it was this part to be exact: "Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful." How this should be interpreted? I have not really followed the previous CoC discussions as I try to always use polite language so I'm sorry if this duplicate. /Jarkko
