Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dja@xxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx, geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, kumba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, paul.burton@xxxxxxxx, pmladek@xxxxxxxx, robh@xxxxxxxxxx, sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx, sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx, shannon.nelson@xxxxxxxxxx, sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, me@xxxxxxxx, makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, willemb@xxxxxxxxxx, yhs@xxxxxx, yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181130214233.GF23772@linux.intel.com>

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800

> Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then?

Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly
does not apply to existing code.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
  - From: Jarkko Sakkinen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 25/35] iomap: sub-block dio needs to zeroout beyond EOF
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]