Using memcpy() to copy lock requests leaves the various list_head in an inconsistent state. As we will soon attach a list of conflicting request to another pending request, we need these lists to be consistent. So change NFS to use locks_init_lock/locks_copy_lock instead of memcpy. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 867457d6dfbe..0ba2b0fb8ff3 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -6311,7 +6311,8 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata *nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl, /* Ensure we don't close file until we're done freeing locks! */ p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx); p->l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx); - memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl)); + locks_init_lock(&p->fl); + locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl); p->server = NFS_SERVER(inode); return p; } @@ -6533,7 +6534,8 @@ static struct nfs4_lockdata *nfs4_alloc_lockdata(struct file_lock *fl, p->server = server; refcount_inc(&lsp->ls_count); p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx); - memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl)); + locks_init_lock(&p->fl); + locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl); return p; out_free_seqid: nfs_free_seqid(p->arg.open_seqid);
