On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:49:48PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> This patch adds a new field b_rw_hint to xfs_buf. We will
> need this to properly initialize the new bio->bi_rw_hint when
> submitting the read request. When the read completes, we
> then store the returned mirror in the b_rw_hint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 5 ++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index b21ea2b..dd8ba59 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1322,8 +1322,10 @@ xfs_buf_bio_end_io(
> if (!bp->b_error && xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp) && (bp->b_flags & XBF_READ))
> invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(bp->b_addr, xfs_buf_vmap_len(bp));
>
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bp->b_io_remaining) == 1)
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bp->b_io_remaining) == 1) {
> + bp->b_rw_hint = bio->bi_rw_hint;
> xfs_buf_ioend_async(bp);
> + }
> bio_put(bio);
> }
>
This will miss setting bp->b_rw_hint for IO that completes before
submission returns to __xfs_buf_submit() (i.e. b_io_remaining is 2
at IO completion).
So I suspect it won't do the right thing on fast or synchronous
block devices like pmem. You should be able to tst this with a RAID1
made from two ramdisks...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
