Mingming Cao wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 19:15 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: >> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 09:31:03PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Aneesh, >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 08:00:54PM +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is EXT4_IOC_FIEMAP going to be added to the ext4 patch queue? >>>>>> I will try to use EXT4_IOC_FIEMAP instead of EXT4_IOC_EXTENTS_INFO >>>>>> in ext4 online defrag when kernel supports it. >>>>>> >>>>> Can you also look at the sparse warnings with the patches ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I have already released the fixed patch before, but it is not in the ext4 patch queue yet. >>>> Mingming, could you replace new ext4-online-defrag-free-space-fragmentation.patch >>>> with old one in the ext4 patch queue? >>>> >>>> >>> CHECK fs/ext4/defrag.c >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:181:7: warning: cast to restricted type >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:181:7: warning: cast from restricted type >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:613:21: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 >>> (different address spaces) >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:613:21: expected void [noderef] <asn:1>*to >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:613:21: got struct ext4_group_data_info *<noident> >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:629:24: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 >>> (different address spaces) >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:629:24: expected void [noderef] <asn:1>*to >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:629:24: got struct ext4_extents_info *<noident> >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:849:29: warning: potentially expensive pointer >>> subtraction >>> fs/ext4/defrag.c:912:22: warning: potentially expensive pointer >>> subtraction >>> >>> you would need http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/devel/sparse/ >>> to find and fix these warnings. >>> >>> >> Oops, there are a lot of warnings. =-O >> Thank you for letting me know. >> I will release fixed defrag patches in a few days. > > As part of transition to move ext4 related header files out of > include/linux, and move to fs/ext4, I also updated the defrag patches to > adapt this change. You might want to checkout the defrag patches in > patch queue and merge the updates before release the new version. > I see. I'll use the latest patches in the ext4 patch queue to fix warnings. BTW, I have a slight question about this warning fix. The compiler with sparse outputs the warning for the following line. slots_range = o_end - o_start + 1; <warning> fs/ext4/defrag.c:912:22: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction Then I tried to fix this line as follows. slots_range = ((unsigned long)o_end - (unsigned long)o_start + 1) / sizeof(struct ext4_extent); There is no warning but it seems hard to read a bit. I have no idea whether I should fix this line or not in this case. :-\ Regards, Akira -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
