Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve I/O priority handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve I/O priority handling
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 19:04:32 -0700
Cc: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@xxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181120015238.26467-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 11/19/18 6:52 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> This small series based on for-4.21/block brings improvements to I/O priority
> hanlding. The main fixes are in patches 5, 6 and 7. These fix BIO and request
> I/O priority initialization for both the synchronous and asynchronous pathes.

Applied, thanks..

-- 
Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve I/O priority handling
  - From: Damien Le Moal

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 6/6] block: Initialize BIO I/O priority early
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V10 15/19] block: always define BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 6/6] block: Initialize BIO I/O priority early
Next by thread: [PATCH RESEND] get_fs_type: Validate fs type string argument
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux