On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 08:33:27AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, Dmitry. I've added the tag to the patch in > my tree. It should show up in linux-next soon. > > I still find it a little misleading to say that syzbot reported a bug > when it actually found a bug inside an earlier version of the patch, but > I'll just learn to get over it. The usual tag for someone that found a bug in an earlier version of a patch would be Reviewed-by:. Is there any reason we can't use that here? The "syzbot+..." email should be enough on its own, I can't see a reason why their scripts would need to require a particular tag. Or maybe we could use Tested-by:, or some other tag made up for this case? I do worry that someone who sees "Reported-by:..." might for example mistakenly assume that it would help to backport that patch if they see a similar-looking oops. --b.
