Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] fs: fix race between llseek SEEK_END and write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >
> > Q2. If it is a bug, how should we fix it?
> >
> > Currently I'm planning to re-introduce generic_file_llseek_unlocked()
> > and inode lock in generic_file_llseek() for SEEK_END. Then replace
> > generic_file_llseek() with generic_file_llseek_unlocked() if it called
> > with inode lock in individual file systems. Please let me know if the
> > way is not appropreate or any other better way to fix it.
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> -Andi

Thanks for comments. I'll make a patch.

Eiichi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux