On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:22:01PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > +/* > > + * crc-ccitt with MSB first (i.e., backwards), so we can't use the > > + * kernel table as-is. > > + */ > > Why not just add a be-bitwise table, similar to the crc32_le and > crc32_be implementation. Yeah, that is probably a better idea. I didn't do it before since this lived outside the tree and I didn't want to patch the kernel. Will that add 1k for everyone? -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
