Re: [PATCH 3/2] splice: increase pipe size in splice_direct_to_actor()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:54:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When copy_file_range() is called on files that have been opened with
> O_DIRECT, do_splice_direct() does a manual copy of the range one
> pipe buffer at a time. The default is 16 pages, which means on
> x86_64 it is limited to 64kB IO. This is extremely slow - 64k
> synchrnous read/write will run at maybe 5-10MB/s on a spinning disk
> and be seek bound. It will be faster on SSDs, but still very
> inefficient.
> 
> Increase the pipe size to the maximum allowed user size so that we
> can get decent throughput for this highly sub-optimal copy loop. Add
> a new function to the pipe code that lets us set the pipe size to
> the maximum allowed without root permissions to keep things really
> simple. We also don't care if changing the pipe size fails - that
> will just result in a slower copy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/pipe.c                 | 10 ++++++++++
>  fs/splice.c               |  7 +++++++
>  include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index bdc5d3c0977d..436bc0464569 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -1109,6 +1109,16 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned long arg)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Set the pipe to the maximum allowable user size. Advisory only, will
> + * swallow any errors and return the resultant pipe size.
> + */
> +long pipe_set_max_safe_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe)
> +{
> +	pipe_set_size(pipe, pipe_max_size);
> +	return pipe->buffers * PAGE_SIZE;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * After the inode slimming patch, i_pipe/i_bdev/i_cdev share the same
>   * location, so checking ->i_pipe is not enough to verify that this is a
> diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
> index 3553f1956508..9749139da731 100644
> --- a/fs/splice.c
> +++ b/fs/splice.c
> @@ -931,6 +931,13 @@ ssize_t splice_direct_to_actor(struct file *in, struct splice_desc *sd,
>  		current->splice_pipe = pipe;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Try to increase the data holding capacity of the pipe so we can do
> +	 * larger IOs. This may not increase the size at all because maximum
> +	 * user pipe size is administrator controlled, but we still should try.
> +	 */
> +	pipe_set_max_safe_size(pipe);

I get where you're going with this, but I have two questions:

- Is it safe to be enlarging the pipe buffer size unconditionally?

- Especially if we didn't just create the splice pipe?  Suppose someone
  comes along later trying to splice things and doesn't realize the pipe
  is now 1MB...

Then I started wondering about the splice_pipe lifetime and couldn't
figure out if it ever gets detached from current prior to do_exit.
I don't think it does, which means that we're stuck with the 1MB
kernel memory allocation until the process dies.

--D

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Do the splice.
>  	 */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> index 5a3bb3b7c9ad..962ba4cfcb74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> @@ -191,5 +191,6 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *get_pipe_info(struct file *file);
>  
>  int create_pipe_files(struct file **, int);
>  unsigned int round_pipe_size(unsigned long size);
> +long pipe_set_max_safe_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe);
>  
>  #endif



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux