On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 05:24:04PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > Thanks pretty thorough - and even looks correct. > I'll re-reading some time when it isn't late, and maybe make it into a > comment in the code. > I agree, this sort of documentation can be quite helpful. OK. The idea looks sound to me, and the only problems I found were documentation. (I'd like this and the details in the 0/12 mail captured somewhere. And if we came up with better blocker/blocked/block naming I'd be happier, though I definitely wouldn't want the patches help up for that.) Feel free to add my ACK to the series. --b.
