Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] xfs: Block size > PAGE_SIZE support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:17:56PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 08:04:32PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:38:43PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > @@ -1416,6 +1420,11 @@ do_copy_range(unsigned offset, unsigned length, unsigned dest)
> >  	loff_t o1, o2;
> >  	ssize_t nr;
> >  
> > +	offset -= offset % readbdy;
> > +	dest -= dest % writebdy;
> > +	if (o_direct)
> > +		length -= length % readbdy;
> 
> Don't we want byte-granularity copies if we're doing buffered copies?

Yes, just don't set -r/-w values when doing buffered IO. O_DIRECT
requires the length to be aligned, too, but buffered IO doesn't,
which is why the "if (o_direct)" case is there.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux