Re: "Write once only but read many" filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You're still being really vague on your requirements.  Sometimes you talk 
about a filesystem that can't be modified after it has been written, and 
other times you talk about a filesystem that can be updated, but only to 
add information.  Sometimes you talk about a read-only restriction that is 
effective against the superuser (not possible) and other times say that 
it's OK if the superuser can modify the filesystem without a trace.

In addition to new ext3 features, using isofs, and chattr, mounting 
read-only and using file permissions also effect read-only status, and 
you'd have to explain how any of these don't meet your requirements.  But 
rest assured that none of them is effective against the superuser.

>Upon changes to its content (via dd) it will invalidate the immediate 
>future incremental checksum.

I couldn't tell what "it" is in this sentence, or what checksums you're 
thinking of.

--
Bryan Henderson                     IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose CA                         Filesystems

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux