Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: warn on un-aligned DMA IO buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/18 7:18 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Now we only check if DMA IO buffer is aligned to queue_dma_alignment()
> for pass-through request, and it isn't done for normal IO request.
> 
> Given the check has to be done on each bvec, it isn't efficient to add the
> check in generic_make_request_checks().
> 
> This patch addes one WARN in blk_queue_split() for capturing this issue.

I don't want to do this, because then we are forever doomed to
have something that fully loops a bio at submission time. I
absolutely hate the splitting we have and the need for it,
hopefully it can go away for a subset of IOs at some point.

In many ways, this seems to be somewhat of a made-up problem, I don't
recall a single bug report for something like this over decades of
working with the IO stack. 512b alignment restrictions for DMA seems
absolutely insane. I know people claim they exist, but clearly that
isn't a hard requirement or we would have been boned years ago.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux