> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Move set_mnt_shared from pnode.h to pnode.c. Change
> > CLEAR_MNT_SHARED() to clear_mnt_shared() function, and move to
> > pnode.c.
>
> I don't see why these two are a cleanup, actually.
People don't like my cleanups :( sniff...
> > @@ -89,20 +100,18 @@ static int do_make_slave(struct vfsmount
> > list_for_each_entry(slave_mnt, &mnt->mnt_slave_list, mnt_slave)
> > slave_mnt->mnt_master = master;
> > list_move(&mnt->mnt_slave, &master->mnt_slave_list);
> > - list_splice(&mnt->mnt_slave_list, master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
> > + list_splice_init(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
> > + master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
>
> Umm... OK.
Yeah, not much of an improvement.
> > } else {
> > - struct list_head *p = &mnt->mnt_slave_list;
> > - while (!list_empty(p)) {
> > - slave_mnt = list_first_entry(p,
> > + while (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_slave_list)) {
> > + slave_mnt = list_first_entry(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
>
> How is that better?
I find it easier to read. Renaming "p" to "slaves" would also have
been better. Single letter variables are reserved for iterators in my
mind...
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
