Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:02:56 +0300
Cc: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181011205601.GA32757@avx2>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:56:01PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> 
> As the comment in the beginning says this test is specifically for addresss 0.
> Maybe it should be ifdeffed with __arm__ then.

Is there some other reason than allocating non-mergable VMA?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan

References:
- [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
  - From: Rafael David Tinoco
- Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix proc-self-map-files selftest for arm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux