On Wed 10-10-18 02:43:46, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:40 AM Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri 05-10-18 17:06:22, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:06 PM Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add stress test for stressing audit tree watches by adding and deleting > > > > rules while events are generated and watched filesystems are mounted and > > > > unmounted in parallel. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > tests/stress_tree/Makefile | 8 +++ > > > > tests/stress_tree/test | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 179 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 tests/stress_tree/Makefile > > > > create mode 100755 tests/stress_tree/test > > > > > > No commentary on the test itself, other than perhaps it should live > > > under test_manual/, but in running the tests in a loop today I am > > > reliably able to panic my test kernel after ~30m or so. > > > > Interesting. How do you run the test? > > Nothing fancy, just a simple bash loop: > > # cd tests/stress_tree > # while ./test; do /bin/true; done OK, I did succeed in reproducing some problems with my patches - once I was able to trigger a livelock and following softlockup warning - this is actually a problem introduced by my patches, and once a use after free issue (not sure what that was since after I've added some debugging I wasn't able to trigger it anymore). Anyway, I'll try more after fixing the livelock. Do you want me to add fixes on top of my series or just fixup the original series? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
