Re: [patch 3/8] mm: rotate_reclaimable_page() cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > -int rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> > +void  rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	struct pagevec *pvec;
> > -	unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > -	if (PageLocked(page))
> > -		return 1;
> > -	if (PageDirty(page))
> > -		return 1;
> > -	if (PageActive(page))
> > -		return 1;
> > -	if (!PageLRU(page))
> > -		return 1;
> 
> Might be me, but I find the above easier to read than
> 
> > +	if (!PageLocked(page) && !PageDirty(page) && !PageActive(page) &&
> > +	    PageLRU(page)) {
> >  

Matter of taste, returning from a middle of a function is generally to
be avoided (unless not).  Anyway, this is just a side effect of the
main cleanup, so I think I'm entitled to choose the style I prefer ;)

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux