> Something to consider down the track would be how to possibly allow this > with SELinux, which only knows about normal mounts. Right. > We might need a user_mount hook which is called once the core kernel code > determines that it is a a valid unprivileged mount (although the sb_mount > hook will already have been called, IIUC). Does the order matter between core code's and the security module's permission checks? If it does, the cleanest would be to just move the core checks before the sb_mount hook, no? Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
